Pro Evolution Soccer has a very addictive single player campaign mode called Master League, with plenty of focus on developing young talent. There are unofficial patches to fix this, but it’s a bit fiddly, and it’s only really fair to judge what you get out of the box, so FIFA 17 dramatically equalises.įIFA 17 vs Pro Evolution Soccer 2017: Career modes Unless you’re a fan of Manchester United or Barcelona – two of the teams that Konami has a licence to use – you’ll be looking at the likes of North London Whites instead of Tottenham and West London Blues instead of Chelsea. On top of that, EA Sports licencing might means it has immaculated drawn kits for hundreds of teams. The players’ movement seem a bit more stilted, and the players aren’t as recognisable. It’s not that Pro Evolution Soccer 2017 is an ugly game – not by a long shot – but it can’t really compete with FIFA. Players are recognisable from the way they move, and if you squint, it’s like watching real football on the TV – especially as now real matches have EA Sports branding everywhere. There’s no question that the way the players move, and the overall presentation is immaculate in FIFA 17. Like a team that suddenly starts clicking when it goes a goal down, FIFA comes back with a bang on this point. FIFA 17 vs Pro Evolution Soccer 2017: Graphics and authenticity
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |